Quotes About Metaphor
compiled by James Lawley
Fritjof Capra, Uncommon Wisdom:
Conversations with remarkable people (1988) Bantam, New York
[page 76-77]:
"Logic is a very elegant tool," he [Gregory
Bateson] said, "and we've got a lot of mileage out of it for two
thousand years or so. The trouble is, you know, when you apply it to
crabs and porpoises, and butterflies and habit formation" -- his
voice trailed off, and he added after a pause, looking out over the
ocean -- "you know, to all those pretty things" -- and now, looking
straight at me [Capra] -- "logic won't quite do ... because that
whole fabric of living things is not put together by logic. You see
when you get circular trains of causation, as you always do in the
living world, the use of logic will make you walk into paradoxes."
...
He stopped again, and at that moment I suddenly had an insight,
making a connection to something I had been interested in for a long
time. I got very excited and said with a provocative smile:
"Heraclitus knew that! ... And so did Lao Tzu."
"Yes, indeed; and so do the trees over there. Logic won't do for
them."
"So what do they use instead?"
"Metaphor."
"Metaphor?"
"Yes, metaphor. That's how the whole fabric of mental
interconnections holds together. Metaphor is right at the bottom of
being alive."
Top
William H. Calvin, The
Cerebral Code (1996) MIT Press [pages 159-160]:
"Kant said that our metaphors comprise the conceptual
spectacles through which we view the world. ... If we are to have
meaningful, connected experiences — ones that we can
comprehend and reason about — we must be able to discern
patterns to our actions, perceptions, and conceptions. Underlying our
vast network of interrelated literal meanings (all of those words
about objects and actions) are those imaginative structures of
understanding such as schema and metaphor, such as the mental imagery
that allows us to extrapolate a path, or zoom in on one part of the
whole, or zoom out until the trees merge into a forest."
Top
Fritjof Capra, The Tao of
Physics (1991) Shambhala, Boston [page 329]:
"Gradually, physicists began to realise that nature,
at the atomic level, does not appear as a mechanical universe
composed of fundamental building blocks, but rather as a network of
relations, and that, ultimately, there are no parts at all in this
interconnected web. Whatever we call a part is merely a pattern that
has some stability and therefore captures our attention."
[JL-This quote may be about sub-atomic physics but could equally
apply to Metaphoric Landscapes]
Top
Guy Claxton, Hare Brain Tortoise
Mind (1997) Fourth Estate, London [page 46]:
"Language, and the ways of knowing which it affords
liberates; but it comes with snares of its own. Although it allows us
to learn from the experience of others, and to segment and recombine
our own knowledge in novel ways, it creates a different kind of
rigidity. As Aldous Huxley said: 'Every individual is at once the
beneficiary and the victim of the linguistic tradition into which he
has been born - the beneficiary inasmuch as language gives access to
the accumulated records of other people's experience; the victim
insofar as it ... bedevils his sense of reality, so that he is all
too apt to take his concepts for data, his words for actual things'."
Top
Robert Dilts, 'Darwin's Thinking
Path: Strategies of Genius and Somatic Syntax' in
Anchor Point Magazine,
November 1996, Vol. 10, No. 11:
"It is also important to recognize that, in addition
to being able to input, process, and output information, all
representational systems have the capability to represent information
in at least two ways: literally and figuratively. That is, each of
our sensory systems can form maps that have either a direct
correspondence or a more metaphorical correspondence to the
phenomenon we are representing. For example, we an visualize the
white cells of our bodies as we have seen them under the microscope,
or as looking like octopi or Pac-Man video game characters.
Similarly, we can speak of our brains literally as 'a network of
neurons' or figuratively as being 'like a computer.' Likewise, we can
experience a particular emotional symptom as a particular set of
kinesthetic body sensations or as a 'knot' in the stomach.
As a representational system, our bodies have a similar double
capacity. We can express movements which are the literal response to
a particular situation, or create expressions which are more
metaphorical, as in a dance. A state of anxiety, for instance, may be
literally represented by reproducing the physical effects that
accompany a feeling of anxiety (such as tensing up the muscle in
one's face and shoulders), or figuratively represented by placing
one's arms over one's head and eyes, as if hiding from something
dangerous. As is the case with our other representational modalities,
metaphorical representations are often more meaningful and
impactful because they carry multiple levels of information."
[JL
- my embolden]
Top
Robert Dilts, John
Grinder, Richard Bandler, Leslie C. Bandler, Judith DeLozier,
Neuro-Linguistic Programming: Volume 1, The Study of the Structure
of Subjective Experience (1980) Meta Publications, Cupertino, DA
[pp 11-13]:
"By understanding that human beings do not operate
directly on the world they are experiencing but through sensory
transforms of that world, we also understand that "truth" is a
metaphor rather than a yardstick calibrated to some absolute standard
of external reality. Cultural models, including that of science, do
not express "truth," but prescribe domains of experience within which
behavior is organized into certain patterns. To the extent that the
structural elements, syntax and limits of each model are arbitrarily
selected and defined, we might suggest that models, in general, are
metaphors for the convenient assumption that experience and reality
are the same. Similarly, NLP is not the "truth" either, but another
metaphor--a user oriented metaphor designed to generate behavioral
options quickly and effectively. ... The overt and implied laws,
rules and assumptions of any model function as codes or metaphors for
different patterns of neurological organisation aimed at producing a
particular set of behavioral outcomes."
Top
Dedre Gentner and Michael
Jeziorski, 'The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western
science' in Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew
Ortony (1993, Second Edition) Cambridge University Press [page
447 and 478]:
"Analogy and metaphor are central to scientific
thought. They figure in discovery, as in Rutherford's analogy of the
solar system for the atom or Faraday's use of lines of magnetized
iron filings to reason about electric fields. They are also used in
teaching: novices are told to think of electricity as analogous to
water flowing through pipes or of a chemical process as analogous to
a ball rolling down a hill. Yet for all its usefulness, analogical
thinking is never formally taught to us. We seem to think of it as a
natural human skill, and of its use in science as a straightforward
extension of its use in commonsense reasoning. For example, William
James believed that 'men, taken historically, reason by analogy long
before they have learned to reason by abstract characters'. All this
points to an appealing intuition: that a faculty for analogical
reasoning is an innate part of human cognition ...
This research implies that although the apprehension of similarity
in its various forms may be universal among humans, conventions for
how and when to use it are not. There are variations both across and
within cultures in the ways humans use similarity to categorize and
reason about the world."
Top
Daniel Goleman, Emotional
Intelligence (1996) Bloomsbury, London [p. 294]:
"The logic of the emotional mind is
associative; it takes elements that symbolize a reality, or
trigger a memory of it, to be the same as that reality. That is why
similes, metaphors and images speak directly to the emotional mind.
... If the emotional mind follows this logic and it's rules, with one
element standing for another, things need not necessarily be defined
by their objective identity: what matters is how they are
perceived; things are as they seem. ... Indeed, in emotional
life, identities can be like a hologram in the sense that a single
part evokes a whole. "
Top
Brian Goodwin, How the Leopard
Changed its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity (1994) Phoenix,
London [page 32]:
"The point ... is not to conclude that there is
something wrong with Darwin's theory because it is clearly linked to
some very powerful cultural myths and metaphors. All theories
have metaphorical dimensions which I regard as not only inevitable
but also extremely important. For it is these dimensions that
give depth and meaning to scientific ideas, that add to their
persuasiveness, and colour the way we see reality."
Top
Joseph Griffin, The Origin of
Dreams: How and Why We Evolved to Dream (1997) The Therapist Ltd,
Halisham [page 21]:
"That dreams use metaphor has been noted by many
theorists but that all dreams use metaphor is a new finding.
My research indicates that, not only do all dreams use metaphor, but
that the entire dream sequence is a metaphorical expression of a
waking concern. This means that everybody and everything in the dream
sequence is an analogous substitute for some person, thing or event
in waking life. ... We are not seeing metaphor used as a dramatic
device to highlight certain principles or concepts as might be used
in the creation of a work of art, but rather the translation of a
waking concern into an analogous sensory scenario."
Top
John Grinder 'An Interview with
John Grinder' in NLP
World, Vol 4, No 1, March 1997 [page 46]:
"All which is not concrete is metaphoric -- clearly,
this involves the vast majority of our everyday experiences. The
structure of the unconscious - easily the most influential factor in
our success in life - or more correctly said, the relationship which
we have with our unconscious is easily the most important factor in
our success in life - is that of metaphor.
The unconscious contains no nouns, only verbs - the part of
language which carries the representation of the relationships and
processes which determine the quality of our lives. This in part
accounts for the fact that the typical production of the unconscious
is metaphoric: dreams, poems, dances, songs and stories."
Top
David Grove and Basil Panzer,
Resolving Traumatic Memories (1989) Irvington [pages 8-10]:
"The first objective is for the therapist to keep the
language clean and allow the client's language to manifest
itself. The second objective is that the clean language used by
the therapist be a facilitatory language; in the sense that it will
ease entry into the matrix of experience, and into an altered state
that may be helpful for the client to internally access his
experience.
By asking clean questions we shape the location and the direction
of the client's search for the answer. In asking a question we
do not impose upon the client any value, construct or presupposition
about what he should answer. ... The client is free to find an answer
and may keep the answer to himself. It may not be necessary for
the client to share his memories, thoughts or feelings, or express
them to the therapist. In many therapies the object of asking
questions is to gather information from the client. Using our
approach, ... questions are not asked to gather information or to
understand the client's perspectives. We ask our questions so
that the client can understand his perspective internally, in his own
matrix. ... We want to leave our questions embedded in the client's
experience. If the client were to come out of [the] matrix to explain
matters, a different environment would be created.
Our questions will have given a form, made manifest some
particular aspect of the client's internal experience in a way that
he has not experienced before."
Top
James Hillman, The Soul's
Code (1996) Random House [pages 39-40]:
"Each life is formed by its unique image, an image
that is the essence of that life and calls it to a destiny. As the
force of fate, this image acts as a personal daimon, an accompanying
guide who remembers your calling.
The daimon motivates. It protects. It invents and persists with
stubborn fidelity. It resists compromising reasonableness and often
forces deviance and oddity upon its keeper, especially when neglected
or opposed. It offers comfort and can pull you into its shell, but it
cannot abide innocence. It can make the body ill. It is out of step
with time, finding all sorts of faults, gaps, and knots in the flow
of life - and it prefers them. It has affinities with myth, since it
is itself a mythical being and thinks in mythical patterns.
It has much to do with feelings of uniqueness, of grandeur and
with the restlessness of the heart, its impatience, its
dissatisfaction, its yearning. It needs its share of beauty. It wants
to be seen, witnessed, accorded recognition, particularly by the
person who is its caretaker. Metaphoric images are its first
unlearned language, which provides the poetic basis of mind, making
possible communication between all people and all things by means of
metaphors. " [JL
- my embolden]
Top
Julian Jaynes, The Origin of
Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (1976) Houghton Mifflin Co, Boston, USA [pages 60 & 65]:
"We invent mind-space inside our
own heads as well as the heads of others ... we assume these 'spaces'
without question. They are a part of what it is to be conscious.
Moreover, things that in the physical-behavioural world that do not
have a spatial quality are made to have such in consciousness.
Otherwise we cannot be conscious of them.
Time is an obvious example. You cannot,
absolutely cannot think of time except by spatializing it.
Consciousness is always a spatialization in which the diachronic
[i.e. Through/Across Time -JL] is turned into the synchronic [i.e..
In Time -JL], in which what has happened in time is excerpted [i.e..
Deleted, Distorted and Generalised -JL] and seen in
side-by-sideness."
"... Consciousness is an operation rather
than a thing, a repository, or a function. It operates by way of
analogy, by way of constructing an analog space with an analog 'I'
that can observe that space, and move metaphorically in it."
Top
Mark Johnson, The Body in the
Mind (1987) University of Chicago Press. pages xiv-xv:
"Metaphor [is] a pervasive mode of understanding by
which we project patterns from one domain of experience in order to
structure another domain of a different kind. So conceived metaphor
is not merely a linguistic mode of expression; rather, it is one of
the chief cognitive structures by which we are able to have coherent,
ordered experiences that we can reason about and make sense of.
Through metaphor, we make use of patterns that obtain in our physical
experience to organise our more abstract understanding. Understanding
via metaphorical projection from the concrete to the abstract makes
use of physical experience in two ways. First, our bodily movements
and interactions in various physical domains of experience are
structured, and that structure can be projected by metaphor onto
abstract domains. Second, metaphorical understanding is not merely a
matter of arbitrary fanciful projection from anything to anything
with no constraints. Concrete bodily experience not only constrains
the "input" to the metaphorical projections, but also the nature of
the projections themselves, that is the kinds of mappings that can
occur across domains."
Top
Arthur Koestler, The Act of
Creation (1994) Dell/Laurel, New York, USA. [page 178]:
"The creative act, insofar as it depends on
unconscious resources, presupposes a relaxing of controls and a
regression to modes of ideation which are indifferent to the rules of
verbal logic, unperturbed by contradiction, untouched by the dogmas
and taboos of so called common sense. At the decisive stage of
discovery the codes of disciplined reasoning are suspended - as they
are in a dream, the reverie, the manic flight of thought, when the
steam of ideation is free to drift, by its own emotional gravity, as
it were, in an apparent 'lawless' fashion."
[JL - The above could be a perfect
description of what happens during the Metaphor Therapy pioneered by
David Grove]
Top
Richard R. Kopp, Metaphor
Therapy, Brunner/Mazell, New York, 1995:
"The power of metaphorical interventions may lie in
the fact that metaphorical images are distributed throughout the
brain in a holographic manner. If so, then exploring linguistic
metaphors and early memory metaphors may activate this expansive
network, and transforming metaphors may reverberate throughout the
entire range of distribution of the image and/or memory."
Top
George Lakoff, 'The Neurocognitive
Self' in The Science of The Mind, edited by Robert Solso and Dominic
Massaro (1995) Oxford University Press [page 229]:
"We have discovered, over the past decade and a half,
that a conceptual system contains an enormous subsystem of thousands
of conceptual metaphors -- mappings that allow us to understand the
abstract in terms of the concrete. Without this system, we
could not engage in abstract thought at all -- in thought about
causation, purpose, love, morality, or thought itself. Without
the metaphor system, there could be no philosophizing, no theorizing,
and little general understanding our everyday personal and social
lives. But the operation of this vast system of conceptual
metaphor is largely unconscious. We reason metaphorically
throughout most of our waking, and even our dreaming lives, but for
the most part are unaware of it. At present, the metaphor
system of English has barely begun to be worked out in full detail,
and the metaphor systems of other languages have been studied only
cursorily. Working out the details would be a huge job -- not
as big as the human genome project, but most likely more
beneficial. For what is at stake is our understanding of
ourselves and our daily lives, and the possibilities for improvement
through that understanding."
[JL - Symbolic Modelling facilitates an individual to achieve
such an understanding of their personal metaphorical system.]
Top
George Lakoff and
Mark Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and
Its Challenge to Western Thought (1999) Basic Books [pages
567-568]:
"The mechanism by which spirituality becomes
passionate is metaphor. An ineffable God requires metaphor not only
to be imagined but to be approached, exhorted, evaded, confronted,
struggled with, and loved. Through metaphor, the vividness,
intensity, and meaningfulness of ordinary experience becomes the
basis of a passionate spirituality. An effable God becomes vital
through metaphor: The Supreme Being. The Prime Mover. The Creator.
The Almighty. The Father. The King of Kings. Shepherd. Potter.
Lawgiver. Judge. Mother. Lover. Breath.
The vehicle by which we are moved in passionate spirituality is
metaphor. The mechanism of such metaphor is bodily. It is a neural
mechanism that recruits our abilities to perceive, to move, to feel,
and to envision in the service not only of theoretical and
philosophical thought, but of spiritual experience."
Top
Gareth Morgan,
Imaginization (1997) Sage, unnumbered page:
"Ideas about organization are always based on implicit
images or metaphors that persuade us to see, understand, and manage
situations in a particular way. Metaphors create insight. But they
also distort. They have strengths. But they also have limitations. In
creating ways of seeing, they create ways of not seeing. There can be
no single theory or metaphor that gives an all-purpose point of view,
and there can be no simple "correct theory" for structuring
everything we do. The challenge facing modern managers is to become
accomplished in the art of using metaphor to find new ways of seeing,
understanding, and shaping their actions."
Top
Friedrich Nietzsche, The
Viking Portable Nietzsche, p.46-7, (Walter Kaufmann translation):
" What then is truth? A mobile army of metaphors,
metonymy's, and anthropomorphism -- in short, a sum of human relations,
which have been enhanced, transposed, and embellished poetically and
rhetorically, and which after long use seem firm, canonical, and
obligatory to a people: truths are illusions about which one has
forgotten that is what they are; metaphors which are worn out and
without sensuous power; coins which have lost their pictures and now
matter only as metal, no longer as coins.
We still do not know where the urge for truth comes from; for as
yet we have heard only of the obligation imposed by society that it
should exist: to be truthful means using the customary metaphors --
in moral terms, the obligation to lie according to fixed convention,
to lie herd-like in a style obligatory for all ... "
Top
Hugh Petrie and Rebecca Oshlag,
'Metaphor and Learning' in Metaphor and Thought, edited by
Andrew Ortony (1993, Second Edition) Cambridge University Press
[page 582 and 589]:
"... the very possibility of learning something
radically new can only be understood by presupposing the operation of
something very much like metaphor. This is not just the heuristic
claim that metaphors are often useful in learning, but the epistemic
claim that metaphor, or something very much like it, is what renders
possible and intelligible the acquisition of new knowledge.
"The educational functions we are proposing for metaphor are that
it does, indeed, make learning more memorable, and that it does,
indeed, help one move from the more familiar to the less familiar.
But we are also claiming that metaphor is what enables one to pass
from the more familiar to the unfamiliar in the sense that it
provides a key mechanism for changing our modes of representing the
world in thought and language. It provides this mechanism not
through a direct labelling, or through explicit rules of application,
but rather because in order to understand an interactive metaphor,
one must focus one's activities on the nodes of relative
stability in the world. Language bumps into the world at those places
where our activity runs up against similar boundaries in diverse
situations."
[JL- my embolden]
Top
Stephen Pinker, How The Mind
Works (1997) The Softback Preview, London [page 355]:
Space and force pervade language. Many cognitive
scientists (including me) have concluded from their research on
language that a handful of concepts about places, paths, motions,
agency, and causation underlie the literal or figurative meanings of
tens of thousands of words and constructions, not only in English but
in every other language that has been studied. ... These concepts and
relations appear to be the vocabulary and syntax of mentalese, the
language of thought. ... And the discovery that the elements of
mentalese are based on places and projectiles has implications for
both where the language of thought came from and how we put it to use
in modern times.
Top
Karl Pribram, 'Metaphors to Models:
the use of analogy in neuropsychology' in Metaphors in the History
of Psychology, edited by David E. Leary (1990) Cambridge
University Press [page 79]:
"Brain scientists have, in fact, repeatedly and
fruitfully used metaphors, analogies, and models in their attempts to
understand their data. The theme of this essay is that only by
the proper use of analogical reasoning can current limits of
understanding be transcended. Furthermore, the major metaphors used
in the brain sciences during this century have been provided by
inventions that, in turn, were produced by brains. Thus, the proper
use of analogical reasoning sets in motion a self-reflective
process by which, metaphorically speaking, brains come to understand
themselves."
[JL- my embolden. While Pribram recognises
"brains come to understand themselves" is metaphorical, is he aware
that, in the same sentence, "sets in motion" and "reflective" are
also metaphors?]
Top
V.S. Ramachandran
and E.M. Hubbard, "Hearing Colors, Tasting Shapes", Scientific American,
May 2003, Vol. 288, No. 5, pp 42-50.
"According to one study, the
condition [synesthesia] is seven times as common in creative people
as in the general population. One skill that many creative people
share is the faculty for using metaphor ("it is the east, and Juliet
is the sun"). It is as if their brains are set up to make links
between seemingly unrelated domains -- such as the sun and a
beautiful woman. ... Our studies of the neurobiological basis of
synesthesia suggests that a faculty for metaphor -- for seeing deep
links between superficially dissimilar and unrelated things --provide
a key seed for the eventual emergence of language."
Top
Ernest Rossi, The Psychobiology
of Mindbody Healing (1993) Norton [page 39]:
"When Jung's patients became overwhelmed with
emotions, he sometimes would have them draw a picture of their
feelings. Once the feelings were expressed in the form of
imagery, the images could be encouraged to speak to one
another. As soon as a dialogue could take place, the patient
was well embarked on the process of reconciling different aspects of
his dissociated psyche."
Top
Robert Stetson Shaw, quoted
in James Gleick, Chaos: Making a New Science, Viking, New
York, 1987. p. 262:
" 'You don't see something until you have the right
metaphor to let you perceive it' [Robert Stetson] Shaw said, echoing
Thomas S Kuhn."
Top
|